- Most obvious similarity: elections cost money everywhere
-
An assumption that to stand a chance of victory, a party/candidate needs to match (if not exceed) spending of its opponents
- Especially in swing states
- Where there is money raised there is influence gained
- Party Funding in the UK
Structural
Campaign expenditure caps
-
2024 UK: national parties limited to ~£54k per candidate standing
-
caps legally allowed total to just over £34m
-
Clear limits on campaign spending by individual candidates leading to a general election
-
Names of all donors giving over £10k must be made public
-
Electoral Commission issues fines for breaches
- Feb 2020, Plaid Cymru fined over £29k for breaching transparency rules
-
US: party finance rules much more complex
- Legislation such as Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act 2002 watered down by court rulings such as Citizens United and SpeechNow
-
Rules that limit direct donations to parties and candidates (hard money)
-
Few effective rules to restrict indrect or independent expenditure (soft money)
- PACs + super PACs
-
No limit on expenditure from candidate’s personal wealth (self-funding)
-
Differences reflect the structural notions of sovereignty
- any changes to US electoral law must be constitutinoal
- any changes to UK electoral law can be passed by statute law (Parliamentary sovereignty)
State funding of campaigns
-
UK: Far more is done by the government neutrally
- voter registration undertaken centrally by government
-
US: lots of energy and cash spent on registration drives
- especially Dem seeking to ensure that minority groups are registered
- Candidates in UK elections legally entitled to free postage of one piece of election literature
Pressure groups
-
PGs much more tightly regulated by the Charity Commission in their poltiical activities, especially during election times
- Charity Commission: “A charity cannot have a political purpose. Nor can a charity undertake political activity that is not relevant to, and dos not have a reasonable likelihood of, supporting the charity’s charitable purposes.”
- UK charities cannot openly support or donate to parties/candidates
- US: PGs can donate, endorse, campaign for candidates using PACs
Legal framework
-
UK: Communications Act 2003 - television airtime cannot be purchased for political ads
- major parties alloacted free slots for party election broadcasts
- US: candidates, parties, Super PACs spent over $12.3b on ads during 2024 election
| UK | USA | |
|---|---|---|
| Main laws | Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act (PPERA) 2000, Communications Act 2003, Charity Act 2011 | Federal Election Campaign Act 1971, Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (McCain-Feingold) 2002 |
| Landmark court cases | None | McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003), Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010), Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett (2011) |
| Restrictions on fundraising and expenditure | No limits on fundraising outside election times | Limits on direct donations to parties and candidates |
| Limits on national and candidate spending in period before elections | No restrictions on self funding by candidates | |
| Large donors must have names published | No limits on independent expenditure by Super PACs |